They hold back the sea – something that even King Canute (of nearby
You could argue that if you’re going to choose to live in a country that
borders a massive ocean and is below sea level, you can’t complain about a bit
of damp now and again, never mind actually being washed away from time to time.
And hats off to the Dutch: not only do they not complain, but every time
they’re flooded off the face of the map by the implacable ocean, they simply
build more walls and dykes and sea-gates. And houses.
Way back when Marken was still an island, the people grew crops. But the
sea came in and washed away their harvest and their houses. So they rebuilt their
houses and, because the saltwater had turned their land brackish, they began
farming livestock instead. But the sea came in and washed away their sheep and
their cows and their houses. So they rebuilt their houses (on raised mounds,
this time) and decided to be fishermen instead. But the sea came in and washed
away their houses (which they rebuilt, on stilts); and then their countrymen
dammed the Zuiderzee and created the freshwater IJsselmeer in its place, which put
paid to offshore fishing, so the men of Marken were compelled to travel into
the North Sea to catch whales.
I mean, golly! Not once did anyone say, ‘Hey guys, I don’t know about
you, but I’m getting mightily weary of this being-washed-away-by-the-sea thing.
How about we go live somewhere above sea level?’
To a greater or lesser degree, this amazing doggedness applies across
all of Holland
and its people. It’s a steely-willed persistence that has kept the nation from
disappearing under the ocean, thanks to a staggeringly complex system of dredgers,
dams, dikes, walls, sluices and canals. (It also makes for a landscape that’s
interesting for about half an hour – then you realise the entire country looks
the same.)
Interestingly for me, it’s also a characteristic that can be found in many
of my fellow South Africans, for the simple reason that they’re descended from
the Dutch. Back in the 1800s, farmers of mainly Dutch descent (‘boers’) living
in the Cape Colony (the Western and Eastern Cape of
South Africa today) had a decision to make. The Cape Colony
had been established by the Dutch in 1652, but had ping-ponged between them and
the British for a couple of hundred years, and by the early 1800s was once
again under British rule. The boers didn’t like this (as is true even today,
the Dutch don’t like being told what to do, and particularly not by members of
other nations), but the alternative was pretty intimidating: to pack up their
entire lives and move, lock, stock and barrel, into the then largely unexplored
interior of South Africa. It was a hostile country, not only because of its
geography, with a giant escarpment to climb, and a massive semi-desert plus
several raging rivers to cross; and its stock of fatal diseases to catch,
including malaria and sleeping sickness; but also because the indigenous people
didn’t hesitate to protect their own homes and families by killing anyone who
threatened them.
On balance, but I would have been tempted to pay my taxes, free my
slaves* and learn to drink afternoon tea. Not the boers. These Voortrekkers
packed up everything they owned and headed north. The story of the Great Trek
is one of almost indescribable hardship and heartbreak, but not once did the
Trekboers consider turning back. For better or worse, it’s an intrinsic part of
the history of South Africa ,
and the inherited Dutch characteristic of fortitude against all odds contributed
to it in no small part.
* I was told by a Dutchwoman (bless her) that the Dutch never owned
slaves. They did. They were enthusiastic proponents of the slave trade, and imported
about 63 000 slaves to South Africa between 1658, when the Dutch East
India Company gave Jan van Riebeek authority to deal in slavery, and 1808, when
the British abolished the trade.

0 comments:
Post a Comment